Part 1 of this blog series started with the assertion that product lifecycle management (PLM) solutions are becoming increasingly important to enterprises, to a strategic degree. However, not all PLM products are created equal, especially in light of their different origins.
My post then explored the strengths and weaknesses of the first group of PLM solutions: those coming from
research on plm for computer
has shown that the research and development (R&D), engineering departments, and related users are not exactly big proponents of ERP systems. Although ERP providers have many capabilities in their PLM portfolios, not all are best-in-class. If a vendor doesn't have its own computer-aided technology (CAx) offerings, fully understanding the real needs of engineering departments, especially with regards to interdisciplinary systems engineering , can be very difficult. CAD and PLM systems are independent